Constitutional Bench: Revolutionizing Indian Justice System!

by Jitender

The majestic cover of the Indian Constitution fills many with pride, not just because of its beauty, but for what it signifies. This document has remained a constant in India’s rich history, upheld by the Supreme Court. Imagine the Supreme Court as an intricate web of legal decisions, each contributing to the fabric of justice. At the heart of this web is the constitutional bench, a critical component that ensures the judiciary’s integrity and authority.

The constitutional bench is composed of at least five judges who come together to deliberate on substantial questions of law, particularly those involving the interpretation of the Constitution. These benches are not convened for routine cases but are reserved for matters of great constitutional significance. This article explores the critical role of constitutional benches and their far-reaching impact on India’s judicial system.

### Constitution’s Custodians: Understanding the Constitutional Bench

To grasp the essence of the constitutional bench, let’s look at some landmark cases that have shaped Indian jurisprudence. These include the Ayodhya Ram Mandir case, the Same-Sex Marriage Case, the Triple Talaq Case, the Decriminalisation of Homosexuality Case, and the Sabarimala Case. What binds these cases together is that they were all adjudicated by constitutional benches.

### What Do You Think Is Common Among All of These?

All these cases were decided by benches comprising a minimum of five judges. The Right to Privacy case, however, was decided by a nine-judge bench. This number is a hallmark of a constitutional bench, but what about the maximum number of judges? The largest bench convened thus far was for the Kesavananda Bharati case, which had 13 judges.

This case was so significant that it even became a question on the popular game show “Kaun Banega Crorepati,” highlighting its importance in Indian legal history.

### Constitutional Provisions Dealing with the Constitutional Benches

Article 145(3) of the Indian Constitution mandates that any case involving a substantial question of law regarding the interpretation of the Constitution must be presided over by at least five judges, forming what is known as a constitutional bench. These benches are temporary and are established to resolve specific cases.

### Circumstances When a Constitutional Bench May Be Constituted

Constitutional benches are convened for various reasons, including:

1. When a substantial question of law related to the Constitution arises.
2. When the President of India seeks the Supreme Court’s opinion on legal questions under Article 143.
3. To resolve conflicting judgments delivered by smaller benches.
4. When a three-judge bench delivers a judgment that contradicts an earlier decision by another three-judge bench.

### Master of the Roster

The Chief Justice of India holds the authority to form benches and allocate cases, a power known as the “master of the roster.” Initially, the Supreme Court had only 8 judges, but as the number increased to the current 34, the Chief Justice’s role in organizing the court’s workload became crucial.

### Vital Statistics About Constitutional Benches

Since 1950, constitutional benches have delivered 2558 judgments, with 12 delivered in 2024 alone. The decade from 1960 to 1969 saw the highest number of decisions, with Justice K.N. Wanchoo participating in numerous cases.

### Key Functions of the Constitutional Bench

The constitutional bench plays a pivotal role in interpreting the Constitution, ensuring that its provisions are correctly understood and applied. This includes resolving conflicts between constitutional provisions and laws and addressing issues of national importance.

#### Final Interpreter of Constitutional Provisions

The constitutional bench has been instrumental in expanding the interpretation of Article 21, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, to include various other rights such as the right to privacy and the right to a dignified life.

#### Final Arbitrator of Conflicts Between Constitutional Provisions and Laws

The constitutional bench resolves conflicts between statutory laws and constitutional values, as seen in cases like the irretrievable breakdown of marriage and the right of maintenance for Muslim women.

#### Final Addressor of Issues of National Importance

Issues of national importance, such as the demonetization case and the control of civil servants in Delhi, are also addressed by the constitutional bench, ensuring that the judiciary’s decisions reflect the country’s needs.

#### Final Decision Maker on Matters Involving Fundamental Rights

Constitutional benches have played a crucial role in interpreting and expanding fundamental rights, addressing issues like the right to life and the right to equality, as seen in landmark cases such as Olga Tellis and Maneka Gandhi.

### Importance of Constitutional Bench Decisions for Different Functionaries

The decisions of constitutional benches are binding on all courts and serve as precedents for future cases. They guide judicial officers, legal practitioners, policymakers, and citizens in understanding and applying the law.

#### For Judicial Officers

Judges across the country rely on constitutional bench decisions to ensure consistency and uniformity in their rulings.

#### For Legal Professionals

Lawyers and law students must stay informed about constitutional bench decisions to effectively argue their cases and understand the evolving legal landscape.

#### For Policymakers

Constitutional bench decisions provide guidance for drafting policies that align with constitutional values and principles.

#### For Citizens

These decisions often address issues directly affecting citizens’ rights and freedoms, ensuring that justice is served and government overreach is checked.

### Turning Points in Justice: Landmark Cases That Shaped the Law

Several landmark cases decided by constitutional benches have significantly impacted Indian law and society. These include the Kesavananda Bharati case, which introduced the basic structure doctrine, the S.R. Bommai case that reinforced federalism, and the Aadhaar case that balanced the right to privacy with the need for a unique identification system.

#### Kesavananda Bharati Case

The Kesavananda Bharati case is famous for establishing the basic structure doctrine, which limits Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.

#### S.R. Bommai Case

This case reinforced the principle of federalism by placing restrictions on the central government’s ability to dismiss state governments.

#### Aadhaar Case

The Aadhaar judgment balanced the need for a unique identification system with the right to privacy, ensuring that Aadhaar is not mandatory for accessing private services.

#### Triple Talaq Case

The triple talaq case marked a significant step towards gender equality by declaring the practice unconstitutional.

#### Decriminalisation of Homosexuality Case

The landmark Navtej Singh Johar case decriminalised homosexuality, granting equal rights and dignity to the LGBTQ community.

### Decoding the Dilemmas: Challenges Faced by the Constitutional Bench

The constitutional bench faces several challenges, including backlogs, complex legal questions, and the need for a permanent bench to address constitutional matters efficiently.

#### Dreadful Backlogs and Delayed Justice

The Supreme Court faces a significant backlog of cases, with thousands pending before various benches, including constitutional benches.

#### Complex Questions That Make Finding an Answer a Real Task

The questions addressed by constitutional benches are often complex and require careful deliberation and extensive legal research.

#### Problem of Subjectivity

The subjective nature of legal interpretation can lead to split decisions, as seen in several landmark cases.

#### Need for a Permanent Constitutional Bench

A permanent constitutional bench could enhance efficiency and consistency in constitutional adjudication.

### Constitutional Bench vs. Ordinary Bench

Constitutional benches are distinct from ordinary benches in terms of their composition, the nature of cases they hear, and the binding nature of their decisions.

### Ripple Effects of Landmark Judgements

The decisions of constitutional benches have far-reaching impacts, setting precedents, evolving societal norms, maintaining the separation of powers, and influencing international jurisprudence.

#### Sets Precedents and Removes Any Future Ambiguity

Constitutional bench decisions serve as authoritative precedents for courts across India, ensuring uniformity in legal interpretation.

#### Evolution of Society by Revolutionary Ideas

These decisions often reflect and influence societal evolution, as seen in cases addressing gender equality and LGBTQ rights.

#### Maintain the Separation of Power and Check Government Overreach

The constitutional bench plays a crucial role in maintaining the balance of power between the different branches of government and preventing overreach.

#### The International Influence of Indian Decisions

Indian constitutional bench decisions have inspired legal developments in other countries, highlighting the global impact of India’s judiciary.

### Wind of Change: Analysing the Recent Trends

Recent trends in the Supreme Court include an increased reliance on constitutional benches, discussions on establishing a permanent bench, and the adoption of technology to enhance efficiency.

#### Increasing Reliance on Constitutional Benches in Key Legal Matters

The judiciary’s focus on constitutional interpretation and issues of national importance has led to a greater reliance on constitutional benches.

#### Whether Setting Up a Constitutional Bench the Only Solution?

While constitutional benches address significant legal questions, there is a need to balance this focus with the efficient disposal of other cases.

#### Discussion on Setting Up a Permanent Constitutional Bench

The establishment of a permanent constitutional bench could streamline the resolution of constitutional issues.

#### Dealing with a Diverse Range of Subjects

Constitutional benches have addressed a wide range of subjects, reflecting the evolving legal landscape.

#### Setting in of Technological Revolution in the Apex Court

The Supreme Court has embraced technology, with digital case management, virtual hearings, live streaming, and AI tools enhancing its operations.

#### Need for Some Reforms to Enhance Efficiency

Reforms such as setting up more benches, adopting strict timelines, promoting alternate dispute resolution, and improving case management could enhance the judiciary’s efficiency.

### Conclusion

The constitutional bench of the Supreme Court is a guardian of the Constitution, ensuring that its provisions are interpreted and applied in line with societal needs. By addressing fundamental questions of law, these benches play a crucial role in shaping the legal landscape and upholding justice in India.

### Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

#### What is the role of the constitutional bench in the Supreme Court?

The constitutional bench decides matters of constitutional importance, such as the interpretation of constitutional provisions.

#### How many judges are required to form a constitutional bench?

A minimum of five judges is required to form a constitutional bench.

#### What types of cases are heard by the constitutional bench?

Cases involving the interpretation of constitutional provisions are heard by the constitutional bench.

#### How do constitutional bench decisions impact government policies?

These decisions often set precedents that influence future legislation and policy-making.

#### Can constitutional bench decisions be challenged?

Constitutional bench decisions can only be challenged before a bench of higher strength.

#### How does the constitutional bench influence the interpretation of fundamental rights?

The constitutional bench plays a crucial role in interpreting and expanding fundamental rights.

#### Can High Courts constitute a constitutional bench?

No, only the Supreme Court has the authority to form a constitutional bench.

You may also like